AI agent development company

Most AI agents
fail on the bad input.

Anyone can demo the clean request. We build for the other five.

Custom AI agents that take a repeated workflow end to end — on voice, email and WhatsApp, wired into the ERP or CRM that holds the truth. When a check fails, the agent stops and escalates instead of guessing.

One workflow first. Write access only after it passes.

The run log is the product.Donna · Order intake agent
RUN 0F31 — HELDIllustrative run
Customer“PO attached. Please process for Friday.”
CheckCustomer PASS · Materials PASS · Credit limit FAIL
DecisionNo order created.
Holding reply sent, escalation raisedNamed owner · extraction attached · nothing posted

The refusal is the feature. A guessed order costs more than the typing it saved.

What we build

Agents for work
that repeats.

Not a chatbot on your website. An agent that does a job your team is doing by hand today, in the systems where that job actually lives.

01 / EMAIL

Order and document intake.

Read purchase orders and requisitions out of prose and PDF attachments, validate every line against customer, material, pricing and credit rules, then raise the document through an approved connection.

Mismatches are held for a person, never posted.
02 / VOICE

The calls that repeat.

Order status, spare parts, complaint intake and qualification. The agent answers from approved data, collects what is missing and hands the exception over with its context attached.

Answered at 23:40, summarised by morning.
03 / WHATSAPP

The thread customers actually read.

Follow-ups, document collection, reminders and qualification on the channel the customer already uses, with the same rules and the same escalation path as the other two.

One conversation, one record.
Thirty-one agents shipped across twelve industries, in English, French, Italian, Hindi and 20 more Indian languages.Try the live demos

How it is tested

We publish the tests.
Run them on us.

An agent that books the valid order is easy. What decides whether it is safe to connect is what it does with the duplicate, the unreadable attachment and the ERP timeout. Those six cases are written up in full, with the expected decision and whether a person is involved.

The pack is published against a simulated pilot backend, and it says so on the page — simulated, connector-tested and production results are labelled separately rather than blurred together.

Read the acceptance pack
  1. 01

    Deterministic checks, not model judgement.

    Customer, material, minimum lot, price agreement, credit limit and approval thresholds are plain code with a recorded result. No model gets a vote on whether your rules apply.

  2. 02

    Fail closed, every time.

    A check that cannot be completed stops the action. The sender gets a holding reply naming what is missing; your team gets the escalation with the extraction attached.

  3. 03

    The run log is the audit trail.

    Each run keeps the input, every check result, the payload sent or withheld, the reply and who was pulled in. Reconstructing why something happened takes seconds, not a support thread.

Integration

Read access and write access
are different decisions.

We scope the access path with the team that owns the system. Nothing is granted because it would be convenient.

01 / SIMULATED

Prove the rules first.

Pilots run against a simulated backend built to the interface your ERP already exposes. Nothing touches production while the rules and exceptions are still being agreed.

Switching over is a config change, not a rewrite.
02 / SCOPED READS

Answer from the real record.

Connect approved services when the workflow needs current order, stock or customer data. Records that are missing or unavailable route to your team rather than becoming a confident guess.

The answer carries its source.
03 / VALIDATED WRITES

Post only what passed.

Write access is enabled for one agreed process, after the acceptance pack has been run. Approval thresholds hold the order for a named approver, and the decision is recorded.

An unauthorised write is not possible, not just discouraged.
SAP, other ERPs and CRM systems: we assess the interfaces, exports and permissions available to you before scoping the connection.See the SAP agent line-up

How an engagement runs

One workflow.
A result you can check.

Bring a sample of the work that keeps coming back. We map the data, the exceptions and the handoff before anything is built, and you get the build cost, the running cost and the launch plan before work starts.

Read a deployment write-up
  1. 01

    Choose the repeat task.

    Share real examples: the emails, the call reasons, the follow-ups. Agree what success looks like and how it will be measured before a line is written.

  2. 02

    Map the rules and the exceptions.

    Which checks are absolute, which have thresholds, who approves what, and what happens when a system is down. This is the build; the rest is plumbing.

  3. 03

    Run the acceptance pack.

    Against a simulated backend first, then your sandbox. Write access follows the pack, not the other way round.

  4. 04

    Launch, then watch the log.

    The first weeks are about the cases nobody predicted. The run log makes them findable, and the rules get tightened from real traffic.

Before you start

The practical
questions.

What is an AI agent development company actually building?

An agent that completes a repeated business task end to end: it receives the work, reads the request, checks it against your rules and data, performs the permitted action in your systems, replies, and escalates what it cannot complete. The build is the integration, the rules and the failure handling. The conversation is the smallest part.

How is this different from buying an AI agent platform?

A platform gives you a builder and leaves the workflow, the master data, the approval rules and the exceptions to you. We scope one workflow with you, connect it to the systems that hold the truth, and run it. If a platform already fits your process, a platform is cheaper and we will say so.

Do you connect to our ERP or CRM?

Yes, through scoped permissions agreed with the team that owns the system. Read access and write access are separate decisions. Pilots can run against a simulated backend so nothing touches production while the rules are still being agreed.

How do we know the agent will not act on a bad request?

Validation is deterministic code against your rules, not a model’s judgement, and a failed check stops the action rather than degrading it. We publish the six cases an order agent has to pass before it is given write access, including duplicate messages, unreadable attachments and system timeouts, so you can run them yourself.

Which channels and languages do you support?

Voice, email and WhatsApp, in English, French, Italian, Hindi and 20 more Indian languages. The languages for a given deployment are agreed and tested with your own terminology before launch rather than assumed from the list.

How does an engagement start?

With one workflow and a sample of the real work. We map the data it needs, the exceptions it will hit and who owns each handoff, then propose the build cost, the running cost and the launch plan before work starts.

Start where it repeats

Name the task
your team keeps redoing.

The emailed order. The status call. The follow-up nobody sent. We will tell you whether an agent fits it — and when it does not.

Scope a workflow

A short qualification form first. A discovery call if there’s a fit.